 |
 |
||
|
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Happy Fourth of July! Celebrating and Defending Liberty
These values of freedom and individual liberty need to be taught in our schools, spoken of around the dinner table, and in all the institutions of the nation as a constant reminder why America is such an economic dynamo, a source of endless innovation, and a place where one can literally travel from coast to coast and consistently be greeted with courtesy and warmth by complete strangers. Writers are, by nature, people who love the written word and turn to it for answers. Let’s look at some thoughts that celebrate freedom and liberty in a world where it exists only for a lucky few of the six billion people who share our planet. In his book, "The Case for Democracy", Natan Sharansky who defied the might of the Soviet Union, later emigrated to Israel, and has become a figure of international renown, poses the question "Is freedom for everyone?" After examining the challenges to freedom, particularly in the Middle East, he concludes that, "My source of confidence that freedom truly is for everyone is not only that democracy has spread around the world, allowing so many different cultures and peoples to enjoy its bounty, my confidence also comes from living in a world of fear, studying it, and fighting it…There is a universal desire among all peoples not to live in fear. Indeed, given a choice, the vast majority of people will always prefer a free society to a fear society." There is much concern and debate over the role of the United States, frequently called the only "superpower" in the world, when it comes to engaging in conflicts far from our shores. Historically, Americans have been reluctant to engage in foreign wars. The subject was widely debated after World War I when Woodrow Wilson proposed that the U.S. join the League of Nations, the precursor to the United Nations. Sen. Henry Cabot Lodge opposed membership, but in a speech on August 12, 1919 he said, "We must set aside all this empty talk about isolation. Nobody expects to isolate the United States or to make it a hermit nation, which is a sheer absurdity. "But there is a wide difference between taking a suitable part and bearing a due responsibility in world affairs and plunging the United States into every controversy and conflict on the face of the globe." Lodge went on to say, "I will go as far as anyone in world service, but the first step to world service is the maintenance of the United States." This was an argument for the absolute necessity of national sovereignty; the right of the nation to protect its borders, determine the makeup of its population, and consider its interests before entering into agreements with other nations. The Senate voted against membership in the League of Nations, an institution that proved incapable of defeating the totalitarian ambitions of Nazi Germany, fascist Italy, and of a Japan which sought hegemony in the Far East. Generations can and do forget the legacy of those who often fought and died to protect and preserve our freedom and liberty. America was unusually fortunate in the company of men who fought the Revolution that achieved our independence and then took up the job of creating a government that would maintain it. George Washington’s farewell address after serving two terms as President offered some advice present candidates for that high office and every voter should keep in mind. Washington witnessed the first evidence of partisanship, the divisions of opinion regarding how the nation should be governed. He warned, "They serve to organize faction, to give it an artificial and extraordinary force; to put in the place of the delegated will of the nation, the will of the party, often a small but artful and enterprising minority of the community, and, according to the alternative triumphs of different parties, to make the public administration the mirror of ill-concerted and incongruous projects of faction, rather than the organ of consistent and wholesome plans digested by common councils and modified by mutual interests." Such felicitous use of the language, in fact, describes the divisions within our society today as parties and groups seek to impose legislative bans or mandates or as others advocate laws based on seriously flawed and even fraudulent science. These "factions" may believe they have the best interests of the nation at stake, but the vast majority of voters reject their initiatives, knowing they will harm the economy, threaten our sovereignty, and degrade the Constitution by virtue of too much federal control over vast swaths of our national life such as our educational and health care systems. America, for all its faults, remains a beacon of freedom and democracy to the world. We have assumed a sacred trust by virtue of the oldest living Constitution in the world. In 1990 when Vaclav Havel assumed the presidency of a Czechoslovakia, a nation that had lived under both Nazi and Soviet domination before attaining independence, this former prisoner of Communism, told his fellow citizens the following. "You may ask what kind of republic I dream of. Let me reply: I dream of a republic that is independent, free, and democratic; a republic with economic prosperity, yet social justice; a humane republic that serves the individual and therefore hopes that the individual will serve it in turn; a republic of well-rounded people, because without such people, it is impossible to solve any of our problems, whether they be human, economic, ecological, social, or political." America is a republic composed of separate republics, its states. Our Constitution clearly delineates and limits the powers of the federal government and allocates others to the states. The further we move from that formulation, the greater the power that is ceded to the federal government, the more we endanger the true power of governance that resides in the people. All around the world, people will look to America as it celebrates the Fourth of July, its day of independence. In the dawn of the twenty-first century, we must not be distracted from the new enemy of freedom and democracy, the Islamofascists who openly seek to kill us and to kill the American dream; a dream that continues to inspire millions in far-off places. The writing skills displayed here weekly in "Warning Signs" are the same that is provided to a wide variety of professional, institutional, corporate and entrepreneurial clients. It is available to you as well for a wide variety of writing projects. To learn more, visit www.Caruba.com. Bush Goes Over to the Dark Green Side If there was one principle that I thought George W. Bush would not abandon, it was his administration’s opposition to the environmental blather that constitutes the UN Kyoto Climate Control Protocol and all the rest of the climate change nonsense that flows from it.
Painfully, Americans and, in particular, Republicans, have discovered he hasn’t a single commitment to anything deemed conservative. Welcome to the New World Order. We should have known that, but after eight years of the Clintons, we were exhausted and desperate. Let’s understand something. China is building coal-fired electricity generating facilities on an average of one a week these days. The Prime Minister of India, Manmohan Singh, said recently that his nation must build hundreds of power plants over the next five years to end the massive electricity shortages that threaten the country’s rapid economic growth. Coal is cheap and plentiful. Environmentalists hate it almost as much as they hate oil, if that is possible. Meanwhile, back in the U.S.A., we are ignoring the vast reserves of oil and natural gas that exist in Alaska and our vast offshore areas. Instead, Bush and Congress are mandating that we turn our corn harvest into ethanol in order to "conserve" our use of gasoline. All this does is raise the cost of food for everyone while reducing the energy efficiency of the forced gasoline blend. Ethanol should be called "Stupidol." And while we’re on the topic of stupid, how stupid does one have to be to believe that human beings can do anything to "change" or "control" the climate?
Closing down everything that would emit a greenhouse gas would have no effect whatever on the climate or the weather. Greenhouse gases are 95% water vapor. The primary effect of coal-driven utilities is that, without the use of available technology to clean emissions, they foul the air for people who live in big cities. Beyond that, they produce cheap, affordable electricity. It was instructive that, right beside the article in my daily newspaper about Bush’s latest act of betrayal, there was one with a headline that said, "NASA chief sees no warming crisis, stunning experts." The only people stunned were the so-called journalists who have been ramming the global warming hoax down our throats for years. The notion that someone might actually suggest there is nothing to worry about or that nothing could be done in the event of a dramatic warming was big news to these morons. The Earth has been warming since the end of the last Ice Age about 11,500 years ago. In the past century the Earth warmed less than one degree Fahrenheit. If you are worried about this, you need to "chill out" and, in fact, since the Earth is nearing the end of an 11,500 interglacial period and we are actually due a new Ice Age. Reports in May of unusual cold spells in England, in June of snowfall in Denver and parts of Wyoming, and comparable events elsewhere around the world are a signal of what is really coming. Anomalous weather events usually precede even bigger ones. Meanwhile, Bush the Younger wants the Group of Eight to love him and, if that means mouthing nonsense about climate change, that’s what he was prepared to do; never mind a Middle East in turmoil, genocide in Darfur, an explosive Horn of Africa, a belligerent Russia, and China and India getting ready to eat our lunch. However, Bush’s sellout is even worse than mere rhetoric. Cliff Kincaid of Accuracy in Media reports that, "Paragraph 42 of one of the G-8 documents, ‘Growth and Responsibility in the World Economy’, declares that ‘we are committed to the further development of an international regime to combat climate change…" To do that, it concludes that "fee or taxes" will be needed. Forget about global market forces determining the cost of energy resources, the United Nations is making a bid to do that. Bush is in countdown mode until January 20, 2008 when he can wave goodbye to all the chumps who believed what he promised and said. I give him less than six months before he’s on the road with Bill Clinton promising to fix the world. To keep you informed on the events and issues of our times, the Center requires your financial support. Please send a donation of any amount so that we may continue to make sense of a complex world. If you would prefer to send the Center a check, please make it payable to The Caruba Organization, 29 West Third St., Suite 1321, South Orange, NJ 07079. Thank you!
©
2007 Alan Caruba. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Sometimes I fear America has become the Paris Hilton of the world, forever inthe media, an incredibly wealthy, pretty creature that often appears to be vacuous, in need of an occasional spanking, and yet fascinating for reasons that defy an easy explanation. Whatever the nation does, however, it does from a set of values and a cultural heritage that sets it apart from every other nation on earth.
Why I was hopeful I do not know because Bush has successively abandoned every single principle of the conservative movement, whether it was to embrace the bankrupt No Child Left Behind formula for wrecking our educational system or to ignore the growing immigration crisis. For good measure, add in his embrace of the North American Union and the UN Law of the Sea Treaty.